La poligamia y la pluriparentalidad en los distintos ordenamientos jurídicos

un análisis comparado para incentivar la discusión sobre la familia plural.

Authors

  • Juan David Jaramillo Manzano Icesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i19.5379

Keywords:

Polygamy, Pluriparentality, Plural Family, Socio-affectivity, Family Law.

Abstract

Although Colombia has made great advances in the protection of rights since the 1991 Constitution, there is one aspect of family law that has been neglected: the plural family. This figure, composed by the spheres of polygamy and pluriparentality, has already seen important advances in other legal systems, such as Brazil, Canada and the United States; countries that, either by means of a law or through a judicial precedent, have managed to present a discussion that, with arguments such as socio-affectivity, or the greater interest of the minor, have been resolved in the acceptance of these figures in their systems. It is time that, as these countries did, Colombia begins a reasoned discussion on the subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bix, B. (2008). The Bogeyman of Three (or More) Parents. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. No. 08-22, 1-11.

Boyd Law Suit. (2015). Boyd Law Successfully Achieves One of California’s First Rulings Under New “Three Parent Law”. San Diego. Recuperado de https://www.boydlawlosangeles.com/boyd-law-successfully-achieves-one-of-californias-first-rulings-under-new-three-parent-law/

Boyd, P. (2017). Polyamorous Relationships and Family Law in Canada. Quebec: Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family.

Chaves, M. (2014). Famílias mosaico, socioafetividade e Multiparentalidade: breve ensaio sobre as Relações parentais na pós-modernidade. Brasilia: IX Congresso Brasileiro de Direito de Família.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (27 de febrero de 2019). Sentencia C-085-19. [MP Cristina Pardo Schlesinger]

D’vera Cohn et al., Barely Half of U.S. Adults Are Married – A Record Low, PEW RES. CENTER (Dec. 14, 2011), http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/12/14/barely-half-of-u-s-adults-are-married-a-record-low.

Davis, A. (2009). Regulating Polygamy: Intimacy, Default Rules, and Bargaining for Equality. Women, Gender & Sexuality Studies Research. 110 (8), 1955-2046.

Delgado, M. (2017) Responsabilidade civil por violação do direito fundamental à busca da felicidade: reflexões sobre um novo dano. São Paulo: IASP

Instituto Colombiano De Bienestar Familiar – ICBF. Concepto 66 del 1 de junio de 2015. Santafé de Bogotá.

Jacobs, M. (2007). Why Just Two? Disaggregating Traditional Parental Rights and Responsibilities to Recognize Multiple Parents. Journal of law & f amil y studies. 9. 309-339.

Kelsen, H. (2005). Teoría pura del derecho: Introducción a la ciencia del derecho (4a. ed.--.). Santafé de Bogotá: Unión Ltda.

Legislatura Estatal De California. (2013). Senate Bill No. 274. Sacramento.

Lewis, M. (2016). Biology, genetics, nurture, and the law: the expansion of the legal definition of family to include three or more parents. Nevada Law Journal. 16:743. 744-773.

Martín M. (31 de agosto de 2012). “¿Una pareja de tres? Sí, en Brasil se «casó» un trío”. CNN en español. Recuperado de https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2012/08/31/una-pareja-de-tres-si-en-brasil-se-caso-un-trio/#:~:text=Sí%2C%20en%20Brasil%20se%20«casó»%20un%20trío&text=Cláudia%20Nascimento%20Domingues%2C%20abogada%20y,las%20uniones%20civiles%20en%20Brasil.

Marvel, S. (2016). The Evolution of Plural Parentage: Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper. 12. 2048-2087

Parlamento de la Columbia Británica. (24 de noviembre de 2011). Family Law Act. [SBC 2011, c 25]. DO: Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Rolfsen, C. (6 de febrero de 2014). “Della Wolf is B.C.'s 1st child with 3 parents on birth certificate”. CBC.ca. Recuperado de https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/della-wolf-is-b-c-s-1st-child-with-3-parents-on-birth-certificate-1.2526584

Santhanagopalan, R. (2018). Menage what: The fundamental right to plural marriage. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 24(2), 415-[x].

Casos citados

Supremo Tribunal Federal. Brasil. (21 de septiembre de 2016). Recurso Extraordinario 898.060/SC. [MP Luiz Fux]

Superior Tribunal de Justicia. Brasil. (14 de mayo de 2019). Recurso Especial Nº 1.608.005 - SC (2016/0160766-4). [MP Paulo De Tarso Sanseverino]

Supreme Court Of British Columbia. Canadá. (23 de abril de 2021) British Columbia Birth Registration No. 2018-XX-XX5815, 2021 BCSC 767. [MP Sandra Wilkinson]

Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Estados Unidos. (8 de marzo de 2017). Dawn M. v Michael M. 47 N.Y.S.3d 898. [MP H. Patrick Leis III]

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Estados Unidos. (11 de abril de 2016) Brown v. Buhman, No. 14-4117. [MP Scott M. Matheson, Jr.]

Downloads

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

La poligamia y la pluriparentalidad en los distintos ordenamientos jurídicos: un análisis comparado para incentivar la discusión sobre la familia plural. (2022). Trans-Pasando Fronteras, (19), 30-65. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i19.5379