Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Visual and Performing Arts Indexed in Scopus: Achievements and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i40.5831Palavras-chave:
Bibliometric Analysis, Scientific Production, Visual Arts, Performing Arts, ArtResumo
This article explores art disciplines, including visual and performing arts, which allow for creative expression and representation. The progress of these disciplines is closely tied to scientific advancements and the spread of knowledge. Bibliometric studies are a valuable tool for evaluating research indicators in various fields, and this study employs bibliometric analysis to assess scientific production in visual and performing arts from 2016 to 2020. The analysis included 173 journals and 373 articles, and the results showed a growing trend in these fields, but the increase was not statistically significant. Additionally, the study found a high rate of documentary production with single authorship, highlighting the need to encourage collaborative networks. The study concludes that the limited collaboration between countries, the unproductive regions, and the lack of collaborative networks for co-authorship have hindered scientific production in visual and performing arts during the 2016-2020 period.
Downloads
Referências
Ali, Faizan; Park, Eunhye Olivia; Kwon, Junehee; Chae, Bonsug Kevin (2019). 30 Years of contemporary hospitality management. Uncovering the bibliometrics and topical trends. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(7), 2641-2665. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0832
Ardanuy, Jordi (2012). Breve introducción a la bibliometría. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Retrieved from https://universoabierto.org/2021/03/25/breve-introduccion-a-la-bibliometria/
Bordons, María; Aparicio, Javier; González‐Albo, Borja; Díaz‐Faes, Adrián (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co‐authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 135‐144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
Castanha, Renata Cristina Gutierres; Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini (2014). Bibliometrics contribution to the metatheoretical and domain analysis studies. Knowledge Organization, 41(2), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-171
Castañeda, Linda (2015). Investigación, conocimiento y participación en la academia 2.0: de la torre de marfil a la galería de los espejos. Temps d’Educació, 49, 89-104. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/investigación-conocimiento-y-participación-en-la/docview/1766799148/se-2?accountid=41515
Chaturbhuj, Santosh; Batcha, Sadik (2020). Application of Lotka’s Law to the research productivity in the 8eld of Thermodynamics during 2015-2019. Library Philosophy and Practice, 4523. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4523
Chen, Geng; Tang, Pei (2021). Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45(3), 459-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09422-7
Chin, Huang; Chew, Cheng Meng (2021). Profiling the research landscape on electronic feedback in educational context from 1991 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 551-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00192-x
Crawshaw, Julie (2020). Artist-led building: farming organic knowing. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 19(4), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1791448
De Moya-Anegon, Felix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente; Lopez-Illescas, Carmen; Moed, Henk (2018). Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.004
Dharmani, Pranay; Das, Satyasiba; Prashar, Sanjeev (2021). A bibliometric analysis of creative industries: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.037
Forti, Enrico; Franzoni, Chiara; Sobrero, Maurizio (2013). Bridges or isolates? Investigating the social networks of academic inventors. Research Policy, 42(8), 1378-1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.003
Gao, Qiang; Liang, Zhentao; Wang, Ping; Hou, Jingrui; Chen, Xiuxiu; Liu, Manman (2021). Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101165
Gómez-Hernández, Yadira; Ramos-Ramírez, Andrey; Espinal-Monsalve, Nora (2020). El consumo de artes escénicas en Medellín. Revista de Economía Institucional, 22(42), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v22n42.12
González-Pérez, Liliana; Peralta-González, María Josefa; Meneses-Placeres, Grizly (2019). La investigación en el pregrado: evaluación de su calidad a través de las tesis. Bibliotecas, Anales de Investigación, 15(1), 51-67. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7871017
González-Zamar, Mariana; Abad-Segura, Emilio (2021). Visual Arts in the University Educational Ecosystem: Analysis of Schools of Knowledge. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040184
Green, Bridget (2021). Revisiting the Conceptual Domain: Educational Knowledge and the Visual Arts. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40(2), 436-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12355
Gregorio-Chaviano, Orlando; Limaymanta, César; López-Mesa, Evony (2020). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica latinoamericana sobre COVID-19. Biomedica: Revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 40(2), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5571
Hood, William; Wilson, Concepción (2001). The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
Lee, Danielle (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of Korean Journals in Arts and Kinesiology - from the Perspective of Authorship. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 8(3), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2020.8.3.2
Lee, Sooho; Bozeman, Barry (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
León, Juan Fernando; Agámez, Valeria de los Ángeles; Ordoñez, Edward Javier; Castillo, Javier Ferney (2022). Producción científica colombiana en psicología en Scopus desde el 2015 al 2019. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 45(2), e323. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.2.1850
Li, Eldon; Liao, Chieng; Yen, Hsiuju (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
Lu, Wei; Huang, Shengzhi; Yang, Jinging; Bu, Yi; Cheng, Qikai; Huang, Yong (2021). Detecting research topic trends by author-defined keyword frequency. Information Processing & Management, 58(4), 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102594
Mateos-Martín, Concepción; Sedeño-Valdellos, Ana (2021). El eslabón-arte en la investigación en ciencias sociales: revisión y modalidades. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 33(3), 669-686. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.68759
Monge-Nájera, Julián; Yi, Siyan; Ho, Yuh-Shan (2021). Bibliometría de la ciencia camboyana: temas, investigadores e impacto en el Science Citation Index Expanded. Revista de Biología Tropical, 69(2), 678-687. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i2.45750
Pauli, Jandir; Basso, Kenny; Lopes, Ravena; Bilhar, Alissa (2019). The Effect of Co-authorship Network Density on the Performance of Postgraduate Programs. BBR - Brazilian Business Review, 16(6), 576-588. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.6.3
Pérez-Rodríguez, Amor; García-Ruiz, Rosa; Aguaded, Ignacio (2018). Comunicar: calidad, visibilización e impacto. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(271), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP-3-2018-05
Peritz, Bluma (1990). A Bradford distribution for bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 18(5-6), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02020148
Pflüger, Hermann (2021). A language to analyze, describe, and explore collections of visual art. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00071-3
Praunlich, Peter; Kroll, Michael (1978). Bradford’s distribution: A new formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(2), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290203
Restrepo-Arango, Juan Carlos (2019). Arte rupestre en Colombia: análisis cienciométrico. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 24(56), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2019.e63236
Rivas-Castillo, Cristian (2020). Hacia una cultura de indexación de las revistas científicas. Revista Ciencia Jurídica y Política, 6(12), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.5377/rcijupo.v6i12.10922
Rodríguez, Antonio; Arbinaga, Félix (2018). Análisis bibliométrico de la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte (2006-2017). Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 13(1), 33-40. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283014061_Analisis_bibliometrico_de_la_Revista_de_Psicologia_del_Deporte_1992-2009
Rubio, Juan Arturo; Caerols, Raquel (2018). La evaluación holística de la investigación en las artes en España: la necesidad y complejidad de confluir las dinámicas de los campos académico y artístico. Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, 13(2), 237-255. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.mavae13-2.lehd
Samitas, Aristeidis; Kampouris, Elias (2018). Empirical investigation of co-authorship in the field of finance: A network perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 58, 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.11.006
Santi, Kurnia; Sholeh, Sofyan; Irwandani, Fathiah Alatas; Rahmayanti, Henita; Ichsan, Ilmi; Mehadi, Rahman (2021). STEAM in environment and science education: Analysis and bibliometric mapping of the research literature (2013-2020). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012097
Saravanan, Panchamoorthy; Rajeswari, Shanmugam; Kumar, Jagadeesan; Rajasimman, Manivasagan; Rajamohan, Natarajan (2022). Bibliometric analysis and recent trends on MXene research - A comprehensive review. Chemosphere, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131873
Su, Xinwei; Li, Xi; Kang, Yanxin (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace. SAGE Open, 9(2), 215824401984011. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119
Ullah, Ahsan; Ameen, Kanwal (2021). Relating research growth, authorship patterns and publishing outlets: a bibliometric study of LIS articles produced by Pakistani authors. Scientometrics, 126(9), 8029-8047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04081-z
Uribe-Bahamonde, Yerco (2020). KEPES, desde Colombia al mundo. Una tarea pendiente: análisis bibliométrico y relacional. Kepes, 17(22), 17-58. https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2020.17.22.2
Velasco, Nubia; Gregorio, Orlando; Alfonso, Alba (2021). Dinámicas de la producción científica colombiana en economía. Un estudio bibliométrico en Scopus 2007-2019. Lecturas de Economía, 95, 277-309. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n95a344139
Wang, Xiaoguang; Cheng, Qikai; Lu, Wei (2014). Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1253-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1347-y
Wright, Tarah; Liang, Yichao (2019). Examining the Scholarly Literature: A Bibliometric Study of Journal Articles Related to Sustainability and the Arts. Sustainability, 11(14), 3780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143780
Xu, Haiyun; Winnink, Jos; Yue, Zenghui; Zhang, Huiling; Pang, Hongshen (2021). Multidimensional Scientometric indicators for the detection of emerging research topics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120490
Xu, Qianwen; Chang, Victor (2020). Co-Authorship Network and the Correlation with Academic Performance. Internet of Things, 12(4), 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100307
Zhao, Linlin; Minns, Marina (2019). Librarians and Academics Building Capacity on Research Impact and Metrics for Creative Disciplines. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(3), 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1649789
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Edward Javier Ordóñez, Valeria de los Ángeles Agámez Llanos, Juan Fernando León Cano, Luis Carlos Rodríguez Timaná, Javier Ferney Castillo García
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Direitos autorais reservados
O material desta publicação pode ser reproduzido sem autorização, desde que o título, o autor e a fonte institucional sejam citados.
O conteúdo publicado na Revista CS é distribuído sob a licença Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Attribution/Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.