Neoliberalism, Expansion of Inequalities and Deconstruction of Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.iEspecial.5211Keywords:
Neoliberalism, Inequality, Democracy, Brazil, United StatesAbstract
In democracies, the financialization of capital accumulation has implied low economic growth and increased political, income, and wealth inequalities. At the State level, it has led to the reduction of social welfare policies. These processes feed the crisis of democratic legitimacy. Considering neoliberal capitalism’s actors and interests, the paper aims to describe and interpret the tensions among three variables: democracy, inequality, and the pattern of capitalism. The hypothesis is that democratic commitment depends, to some extent, on political and socioeconomic equality. It is stated that the significant increase in inequality in neoliberal capitalism weakens the legitimacy of democracy and, in some countries, has stimulated the emergence of authoritarian leaderships. The main empirical basis are the United States and Brazil. A qualitative methodology with process tracing was used to describe the temporal behavior of qualitative variables aiming to explore causal inferences. The quantitative data are subordinated to the qualitative analysis.
Downloads
References
Almond, Gabriel (1991). Capitalism and Democracy. Political Science and Politics, 24(3), 467474. https://doi.org/10.2307/420091
American Political Science Association (2004). American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270404040X
Aristotle (1887). The Politics (Vol. II). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Campello, Daniela (2015). The Politics of Market Discipline in Latin America: Globalization and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Castells, Manuel (2018). Ruptura: a crise da democracia liberal. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Collier, David (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823830. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096511001429
Crozier, Michael J.; Huntington, Samuel P.; Watanuki, Joji (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.
Cruz, Sebastião Carlos Velasco; Kaysel, André; Codas, Gustavo (org.) (2015). Direita, volver! O retorno da direita e o ciclo político brasileiro. São Paulo: Perseu Abramo.
Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (2006). On Political Equality. New Haven: Yale University.
Dolan, Kerry A. (6 de abril de 2021). Forbes’ 35th Annual World’s Billionaires List: Facts And Figures 2021. Forbes. Recuperado de https://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2021/04/06/forbes-35th-annual-worlds-billionaires-list-facts-and-figures-2021/?sh=6b697f5f5e58
Eubanks, Virginia (2017). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martins’ Press.
Facundo, Alvaredo; Chancel, Lucas; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; Zucman, Gabriel (coord.) (2018). World Inequality Report. Recuperado de https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf
Frank, Robert (12 de setembro de 2019). Billionaires Hurt Economic Growth and should be Taxed out of Existence, says Bestselling French Economist. Recuperado de https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/billionaires-should-be-taxed-out-of-existence-says-thomas-piketty.html
Frank, Robert H.; Cook, Philip J. (1996). Winner-Take-All Society. Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us. London: Penguim Books.
Fraser, Nancy (2017a). The End of Progressive Neoliberalism. Dissent Magazine. Recuperado de https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/progressive-neoliberalism-reactionary-populism-nancy-fraser
Fraser, Nancy (2017b). From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and Beyond. American Affairs, 1(4), 46-64. Recuperado de https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/11/progressive-neoliberalism-trump-beyond/
Griffin, John; Hajnal, Zoltan; Newman, Brian; Searle, David (2016). Political Inequality in America: Who Loses on Spending Policy? When is Policy less Biased? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(2), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1371611
Guttmann, Robert (2008). Uma introdução ao capitalismo dirigido pelas finanças. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 82, 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002008000300001
Hacker, Jacob S.; Pierson, Paul (2010). Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38(2), 152-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210365042
Ianoni, Marcus (2018). Estado e coalizões no Brasil (2003-2016): social-desenvolvimentismo e neoliberalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Keynes, John Maynard (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Latinobarómetro (2018). Informe 2018. Recuperado de https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp
Molina, Federico Rivas (10 de novembro de 2018). Democracias da América Latina vivem seu “annus horribilis” em 2018, aponta estudo. El País Brasil. Recuperado de https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2018/11/09/politica/1541766116_145827.amp.html
Mounk, Yascha (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Netto, Delfim (2018). O animal econômico. São Paulo: Três Estrelas.
Palma, José Gabriel (2009). The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers. Why Neo-Liberal Reports of the End of History turned out to be Premature. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 829-869. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep037
Piketty, Thomas (2014). O capital no século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.
Piketty, Thomas (2020). Capital e Ideologia. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.
Polanyi, Karl (1957). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Runciman, David (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books.
Saad-Filho, Alfred (2020). Varieties of Neoliberalism in Brazil (2003–2019). Latin American Perspectives, 47(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X19881968
Shonfield, Andrew (1965). Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2003). Os exuberantes anos 90: uma nova interpretação da década mais próspera da história. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Stiglitz, Joseph; Ocampo, José Antonio; Spiegel, Shari; Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo; Nayyar, Deepak (2006). Stability with Growth Macroeconomics, Liberalization and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone, Chad; Trisi, Danilo; Sherman, Arloc; Beltrán, Jennifer (2020). A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Recuperado de https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/a-guide-to-statistics-on-historical-trends-in-income-inequality
Streeck, Wolfgang (2016). How will Capitalism End: Essays on a Failing System. London: Verso.
Streeck, Wolfgang (2017). Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.
Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
World Inequality Database (s.f.a). Team. Recuperado de https://wid.world/team
World Inequality Database (s.f.b). USA. Recuperado de https://wid.world/country/usa/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marcus Ianoni, Fernando Augusto Mansor de Mattos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Reserved Copyright
Material in this publication may be reproduced without authorization, provided the title, author and institutional source is acknowledged.
The content published in Revista CS is distributed under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Attribution/Recognition-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.