Choosing to comply with the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement. Factors leading to state compliance

Authors

  • Octavio González Segovia Hertie School of Governance, Berlin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i14.1846

Keywords:

India-U.S. 123 Agreement, Compliance, Strategic partnership, Energy security, Nuclear trade

Abstract

State compliance with international commitments is uneven. However, the perception of which countries will and will not comply and to what extent can be biased. Some scholars assume that the U.S. will abide by the India-U.S. 123 civil nuclear agreement, which main objective is to supply India with nuclear fuel. At the same time, some other researchers doubt that India would honor its respective commitments, namely, to maintain safeguard measures in its nuclear facilities. The present study expands the knowledge of the factors affecting compliance within the realm of nuclear trade by analyzing a non-binding instrument negotiated between two asymmetrical actors. Drawing on Peter Haas’ compliance theories, the author analyzes the incidence as well as the relevance of international institutional and ideational factors which, in combination with domestic politics and structures, can influence the actor’s decision to comply. The paper’s findings suggest that India can be expected to more fully comply with the provisions of the treaty than the United States. Depending on whether certain institutional or ideational factor intervenes, Washington is either not capable or is not willing to comply. Its will to comply could be affected, inter alia, by important domestic actors concerned with the application of the Hyde Act, as evidenced during the ratification process. Therefore, contrary to the mainstream view, the 123 Agreement neither enables India to achieve energy security nor ends thirty-four years of nuclear isolation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Octavio González Segovia, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin
    Doctoral student in Political Science at the Hertie School of Governance (Berlin, Germany).

References

A Bad India Deal. (2008, September 30). The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30tue2.html

Ashley, T. (2006, June), Atoms for War? U.S.-Indian Civilian Nuclear Cooperation and India’s Nuclear Arsenal. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/NvvvMH

Australia not to sell uranium to India till it signs NPT. (2008, September 8). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/AxLPLN

Baruah, A. (2008, August 1). Vienna won, next halt N-club. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/Print

Baruah, A. (2008, September 5). Austria stands between India and N-power. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/2oD3WU

Baruah, A. (2008, September 7) A word with China just before NSG waiver. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/mkCA0B

Baruah, A. (2008, September 8). Life after NSG. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage

Berman, H. (2008, August 5). Letter from Congressman Howard Berman to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the U.S. Indian Nuclear Deal, Letter. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/HejUnx

Bhanu Mehta, P (2006, March 7). Nuclear pact launches India into uncharted waters. Yale Global, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/vlzRA5

BJP demands resignation of UPA govt on nuclear deal issue. (2008, September 4). Economic Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/i4G5tk

BJP rakes up nuclear issue, says deal does not permit tests. (2008, August 1). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/sB4CNL

Boeing. (2006, January 11). Boeing, Air India Formally Announce Order Agreement for 68 Jets. Boeing Website, Press Release. Retrieved from: http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/

Buffett’s constellation deal said to worry nuclear firms. (2008, September 28). The New York Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/lMB4o1

Burns, R. N. (2007). America’s Strategic Opportunity with India. The New U.S.-India Partnership.” Foreign Affairs 86(6). Retrieved from: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20071101faessay86609/r-nicholas-burns/america-s-strategic-opportunity-with-india.html

Bush says N-supply not legally binding; India worried. (2008, September 12). The Times of India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/kgbrta

Buy French reactor & get lifetime fuel. (2008, September 19). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/c7dCKy

Chomsky, N., Klein, N., Zinn, H., Benjamin, M., LeBlanc, J., Davis, M., Bellamy Foster, J., & Prashad, V. (2007, September 3). Why we oppose the Indo-U.S. military ties. The Hindu : Opinion / News Analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.thehindu.com/2007/09/03/stories/2007090355521100.htm

Correljé, A. & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective, Energy Policy 34(5), 532-543.

Deal done, now for the deals. (2008, September 9). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/ctRuyA

Dikshit , S. (2008, July 19). Three top scientists caution on deal. The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/wqjYW0

Dixit, J. N.. India’s foreign policy 1947-2003. New Delhi: Picus Book.

Dutt, V. :(2007). India’s foreign policy since independence. New Delhi: National Book Trust.

Embassy of India in Washington DC. http://goo.gl/kqzO9P

Energy security or fuel poverty? (2008, August 26). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/t6TqjJ

Experts express concern over nuclear deal with U.S. (2006, July 3). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/LKxStF

Gahlaut, S (2005, August 31). U.S.-India nuclear deal will strengthen Nonproliferation.. PacNet. Hawaii: Pacific Forum CSIS, Retrieved from: http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/pac0537.pdf

Galluci, R. L. (2006, April 26) Testimony of Robert Galluci before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Pdf. Retrieved from: http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2006/GullucciTestimony060426.pdf

Ganguly, S. & Dinshaw, M. (2006). The Case for the U.S.-India Nuclear Agreement. World Policy Journal 23(2), 11-19.

GE exploring business opportunities in Indian civil N-power. (2008, September 21) Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/IkoViI

GE, Hitachi Forge Global Alliance In Nuclear Industry” (2007, June 4). General Electric. Website. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/isFmYD

Ghoshroy, S. (2006). The U.S.-India nuclear deal: Triumph of the business lobby. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for International Studies, Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/cis/pdf/Audit_09_14_Ghoshroy.pdf

Haas (2000). Choosing to comply: Theorizing from international relations and comparative politics. In D. Shelton (Ed.), Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system (pp. 43-64). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.

Heinrich, M. (2008, September 3). Nuclear states mull U.S.-India deal again as clock ticks. News. Reuters, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OW1yeg

Heinzelman, K. (2008). Towards common interest and responsibilities. The Yale Journal of International Law 33(2), Retrieved from: http://www.yale.edu/yjil/

Hibbs, M. (2008, March 13). NSG drafting exemption conditions anticipating India-IAEA agreement Nucleonics Week

Holmes, Kim R. “The U.S. and India: Partnership for the 21st Century,” February 26, 2007. http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/hl998.cfm

Horner, D. Release of U.S.-India text does not quell controversy over US rights.. Nuclear Fuels 32(17)

IAEA Board of Governors. (2008, July 9). The conclusion of Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols. An agreement with the Government of India for the Application of Safeguards to Civilian Nuclear Facilities. Nuclear Verification, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/17H6b5

IAEA. What we do. HTML. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/uKdlT3

IEA. (2007). World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India insights. Paris: OECD/IEA, Retrieved from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/2007.asp

India, Britain seeking closer ties. (2008, January 22). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/6342391.html

India n-deal may support 250,000 American jobs: US chamber. (2008, September 23). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/2CKbuZ

India, U.S. should look ahead: Jaswant. (2000, March 18). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/bo26dD

Indian Americans ‘overjoyed’ with US House nod to N-deal. (2008, September 29). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/JYUFbT

Iyengar , P.K. Controversy over the nuclear deal. (2007, May 31). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/FGm688

Jansen, J. C., van Arkel, W. G., & Boots, M. G. (2004). Designing indicators of long-term energy supply security. Netherlands Environmental Assessment agency, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/lSq0nE

Kamdar, M. (2007, September, 30). Forget the Israel lobby. The Hill’s next big player is made in India. The Washington Post, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/E3ROyR

Kaul, A. (2008, September 28). France will launch civil n-coop with India: Sarkozy. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/x3M3N8

Kellman, B (2000). Protection of Nuclear Materials. In D. Shelton (Ed.), Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system, (pp. 487-504). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.

Kessler, G. (2008, September 2). In secret letter, Tough U.S. line on India nuclear deal” The Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/02/AR2008090202733.html.

Khare, H. (2008, September 30). France backs India’s quest for energy. The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://www.thehindu.com/2008/09/30/stories/2008093050440100.htm

Kimball, D. (2007). Henry J. Hyde United States / India peaceful atomic energy cooperation act of 2006 (P.L. 1090 - 401): Introductory note. International Legal Materials 46(2):1-30.

Kimball, D. & Meier, O. (2008, August 20). Conflict of interest shadows Germany in upcoming controversial India nuclear trade decision, report shows. Arms Control Association (ACA), Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/node/3291

Kimball, D. G., Ban, H., & Staples, S. (2008, August 15). Decision time on the Indian nuclear deal: help avert a nonproliferation disaster. Letter. Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/system/files/NSGLetterGermanyAug15.pdf .

Kimball, D. G.,& McGoldrick, F. (2007, August 3). U.S.-Indian nuclear agreement: A bad deal gets worse, Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/2007/20070803_IndiaUS

Klug, F. (2008, September 3). US would stop nuke trade if India tests bomb” Guardian.

Koshy, N. (2006). Under the empire; India’s new foreign policy. Left Word Books.

Krishna, V. (2008, July 23). Deal-backers in US rejoice, plan ahead. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=e31bcfe4-96f2-475d-84b1-cb61efda8edc

Lakshmi, R. (2008, September 2). A Secondary Role for U.S. in India’s Nuclear Future. The Washington Post, Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090102728.html

Left Parties.(2008). Left stand on the nuclear deal. Notes exchanged in the UPA-Left Committee on India-US civil nuclear cooperation. New Delhi: Hari Singh Kang, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/ZXQXg9

Lockheed M. (2008). Asia Pacific/India. Website. Retrieved from: http://www.lockheedmartin.com/asia_pacific/india/index.html

Krepon, M. (2007, April 15). The nuclear flock. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Milestones in Indo-US N-deal. (2008, October 2). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/k7jGyq

Mohan, C. R. (2004). Crossing the rubicon: The shaping of India’s new foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan

Mukherjee, K. (2008, September 8). India to sell nuclear deal to world, soothe critics. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OqJ2BA

Mukherjee, P . (2008, September 30). India and global challenges: Climate change and energy security. Asia Society, New York, Retrieved from: http://www.un.int/india/asia.pdf

Nalapat, M.D. (2008, September 9). China’s betrayal at the NSG. UPI Asia.com, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/wjvpQL

Narlikar, A.(2006). Peculiar chauvinism or strategic calculation? Explaining the negotiating strategy of a rising India. International Affairs 82(1), 59-76.

N Deal: ACA asks NSG to reject India-specific exemption draft. (2008, September 2). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/N_Deal_ACA_asks_NSG_to_reject_India-specific_exemption_draft/articleshow/3435211.cms

N-deal ‘ill-conceived’: NYT. (2008, September 30). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/mimnRD

N-deal with US ‘very favourable to India’: Washington Post.. (2007, July 29). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/xHpJnr

Neelesh, M. (2008, September 6). China says it backs India’s nuclear ambitions. Tibet Sun, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OBYoFW

No rush, please. (2008, July 5). The New York Times, Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/05/opinion/05sat3.html?_r=1&scp=7&sq=Nuclear+deal&st=nyt&oref=slogin

NSG waiver: India issues demarche to China. (2008, September 7). The Times of India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/V6oW1D

Office of the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2002). Nuclear Regulatory Legislation. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1(6). Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/vxMdFI

Pachauri, R. K. (2004). The future of India’s economic growth: the natural resources and energy dimension. Futures 36(6-7), 703-713.

Pakistan voices concern over U.S.-India nuclear deal. (2007, August 3). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/kYeIOV

Pant, H. V. A fine Balance: India walks a tightrope between Iran and the United States. (2007). Orbis a Journal of World Affairs 51( 3), 503-504.

Parthasarathi, A. (2008, March 17). The 123 doesn’t add u: Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/igloeY

Pereira, Neelam. “ India’s tryst with the N-Deal.” Current Science 95, no. 7 (October 2008): 821-822.

Perkovich, G. (2005). Faulty promises: The US-India Nuclear deal. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Powell, C. (2004). A strategy of partnerships. Foreign Affairs 83(1), Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/EX8Xx4

Response to Representative Tom Lantos’ letter of October 5 2007 concerning Congressional review of the U.S.-India Agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation. (2008 January 16), Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/UE7BKx

Rice, C. (2006, July 10). U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation initiative. Inaugural meeting of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/68794.htm

Sharma, A. (2007). India and energy security. Asian Affairs 38, 158-172

Sokolski, H. (2008, January 23). Mr. Rudd says no to India on uranium. Far Eastern Economic Review, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/LYa9ca

South Africa urged to block India’s nuclear fuel bid. (2008, August 27). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/Og6ZKH

Talbott, S. (2005, July 21). Good day for India, bad for nonproliferation. Yale Global, Retrieved from: http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=6042

Thyagaraj , M. & Raju G.C T. (2006). The U.S.-Indian nuclear agreement: Balancing energy needs and nonproliferation goals. Orbis 50(2), 355-369

Toshiba. (2006, February 6). Toshiba acquires Westinghouse from BNFL. Toshiba Press release, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/omzdwO

United Nations. (1969, May 23). Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties 1969, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/7N9N5m

Uranium to India: A decision to face. (2008, July 24). The Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/bzBcc2

U.S. Congress 109th. (2006). United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006 (Hyde Act). Report ; 109-721. Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O. Retrieved from: http://lccn.loc.gov/2007395742

U.S. Department of State. (2007, August 3). Agreement for cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of India concerning peaceful uses of nuclear energy (123 Agreement), Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/aug/90050.htm

US Embassy in Delhi. Reaching New Heights. US- India Relations in the 21st Century. From: http://goo.gl/lBeWRc

US-India nuclear agreement going through bottleneck (2008, September 2). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/HGp4r9

U.S. needs to make changes in deal: Scientists. (2007, June 18). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/gi1fth

Verma, S. K. (2007). Energy geopolitics and Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. Energy Policy 35 , Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/fqfqS1

Wable K. M. (2008). The U.S.-India strategic nuclear partnership:A debilitating blow to the non-proliferation regime. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 33(2)

Weiss, L. (2006). Power points: U.S-India nuclear agreement is the wrong deal with the wrong energy source. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 62(3), 21-63.

Weiss, L. U.S.-India nuclear cooperation. Better later than sooner. Non proliferation Review 14(3), 446-457

White House. (2005, July 18). Presidential News and speeches, Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050718-6.htm.

White House Office of Communications. The United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/C3c3N5

White House Office of the Press Secretary. (2004, January 12). Next steps in strategic partnership with India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/dfs4K6

World Bank. (2008, October 17). Gross domestic product 2007, P:World Development Indicators database, World Bank, Washington: World Bank, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/g5z3KP

World Bank. World Bank data profile. Country reports. Retrieved from: http://www.worldbank.org/

Downloads

Published

2014-12-19

How to Cite

González Segovia, O. (2014). Choosing to comply with the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement. Factors leading to state compliance. Revista CS, (14), 201-242. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i14.1846