Legal Ideals: Lawmaking and Law Enforcement Primarily based on Community Social Life in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v23.6008Keywords:
Law Formation, Law Enforcement, Legal Development, Participatory Society, Legal ThinkingAbstract
The aim of this study is to conceptualize how lawmaking and law enforcement work together to serve society’s best interests. Historically, law has primarily functioned as a tool for social control and is extremely inflexible, making it impossible to properly uphold the core principles of justice implementation and enforcement. Law should evolve to become a tool for fostering social development, leading to contentment and the establishment of a just societal order. As a result, legal development should prioritize the desires and needs of the people. This is a socio-legal study wherein social phenomena are interpreted as the direction of legal development. Employing a conceptual approach and analyzing qualitative data derived from a literature review, our findings indicate a shift in people’s desires, particularly in Indonesia, influenced by legal establishments. With the desire to contribute their aspirations into the creation of law and serve as the participatory society in monitoring the way law enforcement is carried out, the development of legal thinking within society is evolving in a positive direction. Legal development must change the paradigm that has previously considered law merely as a mechanism of social control, as a result of societal changes. Both lawmaking and law enforcement should embrace a participatory society. Thus, the goal is to translate this legal ideal into practice by establishing a legal development that benefits society.
Downloads
References
Abadía‐Barrero, C. E. (2016). Neoliberal Justice and the Transformation of the Moral: The Privatization of the Right to Health Care in Colombia. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 30(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12161
Abi. (ed). (2009). Pencuri Semangka Divonis 15 Hari Penjara. Kompas.Com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2009/12/16/13074643/~Regional~Jawa
Aburaera, S., Muhadar, & Maskun. (2013). Filsafat Hukum: Teori Dan Praktik. Kencana.
Akmal, D. U. (2021a). Dinamika Konsep Omnibus Law: Menegaskan Tujuan Hukum dalam Konstruksi Legislasi Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(1), 17–40.
Akmal, D. U. (2021b). Politik Reformasi Hukum: Pembentukan Sistem Hukum Nasional yang Diharapkan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(1), 21–35.
Akmal, D. U., Karsa, P. L., & Madda, S. M. (2021). Law Enforcement of Corruption Cases Through a Participatory Society as an Effort to Protect Constitutional Rights. Corruptio, 2(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i2.2368
Ali, A. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Gunung Agung.
Amiruddin & Asikin, Z. (2010). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Ansari, M. I. (2020). Omnibus Law untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.378
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(2), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i2.789
Asy’ari, S., Hilipito, M. R., & Ali, M. M. (2013). Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012). Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(4), 675–708. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1046
Banakar, R. & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Hart Publishing.
Basuki, K. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kaidah Sosial. Universitas Terbuka.
Bhambra, G. K. (2022). Relations of extraction, relations of redistribution: Empire, nation, and the construction of the British welfare state. The British Journal of Sociology, 73(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12896
Black, H. C. (2009). Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed.; B. A. Garner, Ed.). West.
Buana, M. S. (2010). Hubungan Tarik-Menarik Antara Asas Kepastian Hukum (Legal Certainty) dengan Asas Keadilan (Substantial Justice) dalam Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstltusi. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Candra, S. (2013). Restorative Justice: Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i2.76
Capone, G., Noveck, B. S., Gökalp, B., Knox, A., & Murdter, D. (2017). Crowdlaw: Online Public Participation in Lawmaking. The Governance Lab with The Governance Innovation Clinic. https://thegovlab.org/static/files/publications/crowd-law.pdf
Christensen, H. S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M., & Laitinen, E. (2017). The Finnish Citizens’ Initiative: Towards Inclusive Agenda‐setting? Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12096
CNN Indonesia. (2022a). Kronologi Lengkap Satu Bulan Kasus Brigadir J. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220808102217-12-831593/kronologi-lengkap-satu-bulan-kasus-brigadir-j/3
CNN Indonesia. (2022b). Massa Mahasiswa Demo Tolak KUHP Bermasalah di DPR. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20221215161047-20-887914/massa-mahasiswa-demo-tolak-kuhp-bermasalah-di-dpr
Darmodiharjo, D. & Shidarta. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dimyati, K., Nashir, H., Elviandri, E., Absori, A., Wardiono, K., & Budiono, A. (2021). Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis. Heliyon, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865
Dwiatmodjo, H. (2012). Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Kasus Pencurian Kakao. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(1), 99–116.
Ervasti, H. (2001). Class, individualism and the Finnish welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892870101100102
Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a Process. The Philosophical Review, 28(6), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2178307
Friedman, L. M. (1969). Legal Culture and Social Development. Law & Society Review, 4(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052760
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russel Sage Foundation.
Gillespie, J. (2008). Localizing Global Rules: Public Participation in Lawmaking in Vietnam. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(3), 673–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00118.x
Halim, A. R. (1987). Evaluasi Kuliah Filsafat Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Herlina, A. (2004). Restorative Justice. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 3(3), 19–28.
Howard, C. (1999). The American Welfare State, or States? Political Research Quarterly, 52(2), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200209
Humas dan Protokol BPHN. (2022). RUU KUHP Disahkan Menjadi Undang-Undang. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM Republik Indonesia. https://bphn.go.id/publikasi/berita/202212061210189/ruu-kuhp-disahkan-menjadi-undang-undang
Idhom, A. M. (2019). Penyebab Demo Mahasiswa Hari Ini Dan Respon Jokowi Soal RUU KUHP. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/penyebab-demo-mahasiswa-hari-ini-dan-respons-jokowi-soal-ruu-kuhp-eiAV
Irianto, S. & Sidharta. (2009). Metode Peneltian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Isharyanto. (2016). Teori Hukum: Suatu Pengantar dengan Pendekatan Tematik. WR.
Jeremiah, K. S. & Manurung, K. H. (2022). Analisis Perbuatan Obstruction of Justice yang dilakukan oleh Aparat Kepolisian dalam Perkara Pembunuhan berencana. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 4(2), 99–111.
Johnson, A. S. (2006). Sosiologi Hukum. Rineka Cipta.
Julyano, M. & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. CREPIDO, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
Kusnadi, M. & Saragih, B. R. (2008). Ilmu Negara. Gaya Media Pratama.
Latipulhayat, A. (2015). Khazanah: Jeremy Bentham. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a12
Lukman, M. (1998). Semiotika Reformasi Hukum Res Publika, Res Konstitusi, dan Res Ketuhanan. Perspektif, 3(3), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v3i3.216
Marzuki, P. M. (1999). Reformasi Hukum dan Pendidikan Hukum di Indonesia. Perspektif, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v4i1.202
MD, M. M. (2006). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Pustaka LP3ES.
Mertokusumo, S. (2011). Teori Hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya.
Montesquieu. (2013). The Spirit of Laws: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Politik (M. Khoiril Anam, Trans.; Nurainun Mangungsong, Ed.). Nusa Media.
MYS. (2013). Menggali Karakter Hukum Progresif. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menggali-karakter-hukum-progresif-lt529c62a965ce3
Nonet, P. & Selznick, P. (2001). Law & Society in Transition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787540
Nurhayati, Y. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Nusa Media.
Pekkanen, R. J. & Pekkanen, S. M. (Eds.). (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190050993.001.0001
Prayitno, K. (2012). Restoratif Justice untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116
Purwokerto District Court. (2009). Decision Number 247/Pid.B/2009/Pn.Pwt.
Puspito, B. & Masyhar, A. (2023). Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i1.64078
Putri, K. D. A. & Arifin, R. (2019). Tinjauan Teoritis Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Hukum di Indonesia. MIMBAR YUSTITIA, 2(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v2i2.1344
Putro, W. D. (2011). Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum. Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2004). Hukum Progresif (Penjelajahan Suatu Gagasan). Newsletter Number 59.
Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(1), 1.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Rato, D. (2010). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum (Mencari, Menemukan dan Memahami Hukum). Laksbang Pressindo.
Republic of Indonesia. (1945). 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Rodiyah, R., Idris, S. H., & Smith, R. B. (2023). Mainstreaming Justice in the Establishment of Laws and Regulations Process: Comparing Case in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 333–378. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60096
Roestandi, A. (1980). Pengantar Teori Hukum. Fakultas Hukum Uninus.
Rondonuwu, D. E. (2014). Hukum Progresif: Upaya untuk Mewujudkan Ilmu Hukum Menjadi Sebenar Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum. Lex Administratum, 2(2), 75–90.
Rumokoy, D. A. & Maramis, F. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Raja Grapindo Persada.
Sahbani, A. (2017). Sekilas Sejarah dan Problematika Pembahasan RKUHP. HukumOnline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sekilas-sejarah-dan-problematika-pembahasan-rkuhp-lt5a42131b82c60
Sampara, S., Agis, A., Sufran, M., Basyuni, F., Hasanuddin, N., Handa, D., Kadir, H., Nurjaya, & Kanenu, H. (2011). Buku Ajar: Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Total Media.
Santoso, B. (1998). Reformasi dan Ketahanan Nasional. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 3(3), 1–11. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkn/article/view/19196
Sanyoto. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.3.74
Saputra, E. Y. (2023). Breaking News: Ferdy Sambo Divonis Hukuman Mati. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1690864/breaking-news-ferdy-sambo-divonis-hukuman-mati
Satria, H. (2018). Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123
Shidarta. (2013). Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum. Genta Publishing.
Soekanto, S. (1986). Mengenal Sosiologi Hukum. Alumni.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S. & Mamuji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Soeroso, R. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Suhardin, Y. (2007). Peranan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 25(3), 270–282.
Sunstein, C. R. (1996). On the Expressive Function of Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144(5), 2021–2053. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312647
Suparman Usman. (2008). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Gaya Media Pratama.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Supreme Court Circular of the Republic of Indonesia Number 04 of 2011 on the Treatment of the Reporter of a Criminal Offense (Whistleblower) and Witnesses of the Perpetrators who Work Together (Justice Collaborators) in a Particular Crime Case.
Suriadinata, V. (2019). Penyusunan Undang-Undang di Bidang Investasi: Kajian Pembentukan Omnibus Law di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p115-132
Sutrisna, T. (2022). Demo Tolak UU Cipta Kerja, Massa Buruh Panjat Gerbang Utama DPR/MPR RI. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/08/10/13434841/demo-tolak-uu-cipta-kerja-massa-buruh-panjat-gerbang-utama-dpr-mpr-ri?page=all
Taylor, D. B. (2021). George Floyd Protests: A Timeline. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/george-floyd-protests-timeline.html
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.
Trubek, D. M. (1972). Toward a Social Theory of Law: An Essay on the Study of Law and Development. The Yale Law Journal, 82(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/795251
Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
Uke, L. O. M. I. A. A. (2017). Teori Keadilan Kontemporer (Sebuah Kajian Teori Hukum). Jurnal Al-’Adl, 10(1), 84–103.
Utrecht, E. (1989). Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia (M. S. Djindang, Adapt. & Rev.). Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Wiryono, S. (2023). Hakim Terima Status Richard Eliezer sebagai ‘Justice Collaborator’. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/02/15/12432221/hakim-terima-status-richard-eliezer-sebagai-justice-collaborator
Yu-Lan, F. (1966). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. The Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Diya Ul Akmal, Fauzziyyah Azhar Ramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Material in this publication may be reproduced without authorization, provided the title, author and institutional source is acknowledged.
How to Cite
