Niccolò Machiavelli: Father of Modern Constitutionalism

Authors

  • Juan David Almeyda Sarmiento

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v18.4578

Keywords:

Niccolò Machiavelli, Constitutionalism, Philosophy of law, Law history

Abstract

Niccolò Machiavelli is the father of modern constitutionalism. Constitutionalism began anew in the modern world with the study of the ancient republics and it was Machiavelli who inaugurated this revived science of politics. Five hundred years after the composition of Il principe and the Discorsi we are still working out the implications of applying reason to the structures of law and government in pursuit of justice and the common good. Modern constitutionalism and ancient republicanism share three central beliefs: first, that government should serve justice and the common good; second, that government should do so through known and stable laws; third, that these will best be secured through the checks and balances of a well-designed constitution. Machiavelli took the theories and experiences of republican Rome and applied them to his own era. This application of reason to constitutional design transformed the politics of emergent modernity and reconfigured government throughout the world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juan David Almeyda Sarmiento

    Egresado del programa de filosofía de la Universidad Industrial de Santander

References

Adams, J. (1787–1788). A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America. London: Dilly.

Adams, J. (2000). Thoughts on Government. En J. Adams. The Revolutionary Writings of John Adams. Ed. C. B. Thompson. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Aristoteles. (1957). Politics. (W. Ross, Trad.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cicerón, M. (1913). De officiis. (W. Miller, Trad.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cicerón, M. (1928). De re publica et De legibus. (C. Keyes, Trad.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Harrington, J. (1977). The Commonwealth of Oceana. En J. Harrington. The Political Works of James Harrington. Ed. J. G. A. Pocock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Livio, T. (1919). Ab urbe condita. Libri VI–X. (C. Walters y R. Conway, Trads) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Livio, T. (1974). Ab urbe condita. Libri I–V. (R. Ogilvie, Trad.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maquiavelo, N. 2001. El principe (4 ed.). (H. Puigdomenech, Trad.) Madrid: Tecnos.

Maquiavelo, N. 1987. Discursos sobre la primera década de Tito Livio. (A. Martínez Trad.) Madrid: Alianza.

Milton, J. (1991). Political Writings. Ed. M. Dzelzainis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Montesquieu, C. (1748). De l’esprit des lois. Geneva: Barillot.

Platón. (1902). Opera. Ed. I. Burnet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Plutarco. (1949–1971). Vitae. Ed. C. Lindskog and K. Ziegler. Leipzig: Teubner.

Polybius. (1922). Historiae. (W. Paton, Trad.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rousseau, J. (1762). Du contrat social. Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.

Sallustius, G. (1931). Bellum catilinae et bellum iugurthinum. (J. Rolfe, Trad.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sellers, M. (1998). The Sacred Fire of Liberty: Republicanism, Liberalism, and the Law. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Sellers, M. (2009). The Influence of Marcus Tullius Cicero on Modern Legal and Political Ideas. En Ciceroniana 13, pp. 245–280.

Sellers, M. (2014). What is the Rule of Law and Why Is It so Important? En The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State. Ed. R. Silkenat, J. Hickey y P. Barenboim. Dordrecht: Springer.

Sellers, M. (2004). Niccolò Machiavelli: Father of Modern Constitutionalism. En Ratio Juris, 28 (2), pp. 216-225.

Sidney, A. (1698). Discourses Concerning Government. London: Booksellers of London and Westminster.

Tácito, C. (1906). Annalium libri. Ed. C. Fisher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tácito, C. (1911). Historiarum libri. Ed. C. Fisher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-13

How to Cite

Niccolò Machiavelli: Father of Modern Constitutionalism (J. D. Almeyda Sarmiento , Trans.). (2021). Precedente Revista Jurídica, 18, 199-216. https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v18.4578