How do the Constitutional Courts decide?

Authors

  • Pasquale Pasquino Universidad de New York, New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v9.2424

Keywords:

Decisions of the constitutional courts, Deliberation in the constitutional courts, Constitutional adjudication, Comparative law of constitutional courts,

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the mode of production of judicial sentences drafted by constitutional courts in Europe. The natural object of study of the constitutional theory is the analysis of this final product of judicial creation of Law by Constitutional Courts. However, the doctrine has not given sufficient attention –from a comparative law perspective– to the mechanisms and procedures that lead to the decisions of these institutions. Thus, this document will classify the different types of decision-making processes in the courts, analyzing the stages that make up the «mode of production», from the study of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Constitutional Council of the French Republic, The Constitutional Court of Italy and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. At the end of the paper, some conclusions are made about the period of the magistrates, their party affiliation, the temporary restrictions of deliberation and institutional factors such as the number of attendees or the personalization of its members.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Pasquale Pasquino, Universidad de New York, New York
    Senior research fellow en el Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique de París y Distinguished Professor in Politics and Law en NYU (New York University).

Downloads

Published

2016-12-07

How to Cite

Pasquino, P. (2016). How do the Constitutional Courts decide?. Precedente Revista Jurídica, 9, 9-44. https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v9.2424