The role of a public university in a global environment: networks and externalities of the R&D of the Cauca University

Zamanda Correa Correa; Carolina Delgado Hurtado; Yenni Angélica Conde Cardona

doi:10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.005

Autores/as

Zamanda Correa Correa Full time professor and researcher, Faculty of Accounting, Economics and Management Sciences of the University of Cauca
Carolina Delgado Hurtado Full time professor and researcher, Faculty of Accounting, Economics and Management Sciences of the University of Cauca
Yenni Angélica Conde Cardona Full time professor and researcher, Faculty of Accounting, Economics and Management Sciences of the University of Cauca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.005

Palabras clave:

Global environment, Externalities, Public university

Resumen

This article analyzes indicators of science and technology, showing the participation of the University of
Cauca in the generation of network externalities. The methodology addresses quantitative and qualitative
designs. Consists of a descriptive study that covers the main indicators of R&D and network externalities
from the view of the specialized literature, and an analytical study that uses the technique known as
method of consensus panel of experts. The answers of the experts are processed to determine the level of
consistency and identify indicators of R&D that facilitate the measurement of network externalities, such
as the production of new knowledge-related products; number of networks through programs of
postgraduates in national conventions; and number of graduates in specializations, master’s and doctoral
programs.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Zamanda Correa Correa, Full time professor and researcher, Faculty of Accounting, Economics and Management Sciences of the University of Cauca

Referencias

Adams J. Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth. Journal of Political Economy. 1990; 98:673–702.

Ander–Egg E. Técnicas de Investigación Social. Buenos Aires: El Cid Editor. 1980.

Arrow K. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. The National Bureau of Economic Reseach. Princeton: University Press. 1962.

Bersanelli M, Gargantini M. Solo el asombro conoce la aventura de la investigación científica. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro. 2006.

Castells M. La era de la información Economía, sociedad y cultura. Volumen 1. La sociedad red. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. 1997.

Castro E., Conesa F., Fernández I. and Gutiérrez A (2008). El Contexto de la Cooperación Empresa/Universidad. Sala de Lectura CTS+I de la OIE. [accessed 2011 Feb 25]. Disponible en: http://www.oei.es/salactsi/lucio07.PDF.

Cohen W, Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 1989; 99:569–96.

Coccia M, Rolfo S. The Technology Transfer in the Italian National Research Council. The case of the Institutes in the Piedmont Region. At 3rd International Conference on Technology Policy &.

Chinman M., Imm P. and Wandersman A. (2004). Getting to outcomes 2004. Promoting Accountability Trhoug Methods and Tools For Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation. Rand Health. [accessed 2012 Feb 5]. Disponible en: http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR101.html.

Dorado D. Subsistemas que Conforman el SNI: Colciencias. En: Plan Nacional de desarrollo científico, tecnológico y de innovación 2007–2019. Colombia. 2005.

Ernst, K. (2002). COH Muttart research Project. Hull outcome monitoring and evaluation system: COI outcome model. Alberta council of Women's Shelters Outcome Project. Canadian Outcomes Institute. Available from: http://www.hmrp.net/CanadianOutcomesInstitute/projects/pdf_common/HOMESOutcomeModel.pdf.

Jaffe A. Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the Advanced Technology Program. Economic Assessment Office, The Advanced Technology Program. National Institutes of Standards and Technology. U. S. Department of Commerce. 1996.

Jaffe A. The Importance of Spillovers in the Policy Mission of the Advanced Technology Program. Journal of Technology Transfer. 1998; 23:11–9.

General Accounting Office (1995). Performance Measurement: Efforts to Evaluate the Advanced Technology Program. GAO. RCED–95–68. Washington, D.C., USA.

Goto A, Suzuki K. R&D Capital Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1989; 71:555–64.

Griliches Z. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Resarch and Development to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979; 10:92–116.

Guzmán A, Trujillo M. Políticas de incentivos relacionadas con la investigación: una revisión crítica desde la Teoría de Contratos. Estudios Gerenciales. 2011; 120:127–46.

Hidalgo A. La Autorregulación de la Economía Mundial. Una Perspectiva Enactiva. En: Actas VII Reunión de Economía Mundial (Congreso Internacional). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid y SEM. 2011.

Houssey B. Función Social de la Universidad. Mendoza: Best Hermanos. 1941.

Katz, C. (2011). El Enredo de las Redes. Un análisis Crítico de M. Castells. [accessed 2012 Feb 1]. Disponible en: http://www.monografias.com/trabajos912/enredo–de–redes/enredo–de–redes.zip.

Katz M, Shapiro C. Network Externalities. Competition and Compatibility. American Economic Review. 1985; 75:424–40.

Levin R, Klevorick A, Richard N, Winter S. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987; 783–831.

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved January 21, 2014. Available from: http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marp.html.

Medellín M, Nieto L. El Papel de la Universidad en la Gestión Ambiental. La Participación Ciudadana es Imprescindible. Pulso Diario de San Luis. Sección Ideas. México. 1999.

Pineda L. Marco Conceptual de los Sistemas Nacionales de Innovación. Documento presentado en Primer Encuentro Nacional De Innovación DNP–COLCIENCIAS–ANIDE en Bogotá Colombia. 2002.

Ruegg, R. and Feller, I. (2003). A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade. [accessed 2011 Jul 2]. Disponible en: http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/gcr03–857/contents.htm.

Souza J. Evaluación de los Resultados del Financiamiento Público a la Innovación: Objetivos. Conceptos y Directrices. Espacios. 2001; 22.

Tassey G. Technology and Economic Growth: Implications for Federal Policy, Planning port 95–3. Whasington, D. C., USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.; 1995.