P-model usage

Koen Hufkens, Josefa Arán

The rsofun package and framework includes two distinct simulation models. The p-model and biomee (which in part relies on p-model component). Here we give a short example on how to run the p-model on the included demo datasets to familiarize yourself with both the data structure and the outputs.

Demo data

The package includes two demo datasets to run and validate p-model output using GPP observations. These files can be directly loaded into your workspace by typing:

library(rsofun)

# this is to deal with an error p_model_drivers.rds not being found 
p_model_drivers
#> # A tibble: 1 × 4
#>   sitename params_siml       site_info        forcing              
#>   <chr>    <list>            <list>           <list>               
#> 1 FR-Pue   <tibble [1 × 11]> <tibble [1 × 4]> <tibble [2,190 × 13]>

p_model_validation
#> # A tibble: 1 × 2
#>   sitename data                
#>   <chr>    <list>              
#> 1 FR-Pue   <tibble [2,190 × 3]>

These are real data from the French FR-Pue fluxnet site. Information about data structure, variable names, and their meaning and units can be found in the reference pages of p_model_drivers and p_model_validation. We can use these data to run the model, together with observations of GPP we can also calibrate p-model parameters.

Another two datasets are provided as an example to validate the model against leaf traits data, rather than fluxes. Measurements of Vcmax25 (aggregated over species) for a subset of 4 sites from the GlobResp database (Atkin et al., 2015) are given in p_model_validation_vcmax25 and the corresponding forcing for the P-model is given in p_model_drivers_vcmax25. Since leaf traits are only measured once per site, the forcing used is a single year of average climate (the average measurements between 2001 and 2015 on each day of the year).

p_model_drivers_vcmax25
#> # A tibble: 4 × 4
#>   sitename             params_siml       site_info        forcing            
#>   <chr>                <list>            <list>           <list>             
#> 1 Reichetal_Colorado   <tibble [1 × 11]> <tibble [1 × 6]> <tibble [365 × 13]>
#> 2 Reichetal_New_Mexico <tibble [1 × 11]> <tibble [1 × 6]> <tibble [365 × 13]>
#> 3 Reichetal_Venezuela  <tibble [1 × 11]> <tibble [1 × 6]> <tibble [365 × 13]>
#> 4 Reichetal_Wisconsin  <tibble [1 × 11]> <tibble [1 × 6]> <tibble [365 × 13]>

p_model_validation_vcmax25
#> # A tibble: 4 × 2
#> # Groups:   sitename [4]
#>   sitename             data            
#>   <chr>                <list>          
#> 1 Reichetal_Colorado   <tibble [1 × 2]>
#> 2 Reichetal_New_Mexico <tibble [1 × 2]>
#> 3 Reichetal_Venezuela  <tibble [1 × 2]>
#> 4 Reichetal_Wisconsin  <tibble [1 × 2]>

For the remainder of this vignette, we will use the GPP flux datasets. The workflow is exactly the same for leaf traits data.

To get your raw data into the structure used within rsofun, please see R packages ingestr and FluxDataKit.

Running model

With all data prepared we can run the P-model using runread_pmodel_f(). This function takes the nested data structure and runs the model site by site, returning nested model output results matching the input drivers.

# define model parameter values from previous
# work
params_modl <- list(
    kphio              = 0.04998,    # setup ORG in Stocker et al. 2020 GMD
    kphio_par_a        = 0.0,        # set to zero to disable temperature-dependence of kphio
    kphio_par_b        = 1.0,
    soilm_thetastar    = 0.6 * 240,  # to recover old setup with soil moisture stress
    soilm_betao        = 0.0,
    beta_unitcostratio = 146.0,
    rd_to_vcmax        = 0.014,      # value from Atkin et al. 2015 for C3 herbaceous
    tau_acclim         = 30.0,
    kc_jmax            = 0.41
  )

# run the model for these parameters
output <- rsofun::runread_pmodel_f(
  p_model_drivers,
  par = params_modl
  )

Plotting output

We can now visualize both the model output and the measured values together.

# Load libraries for plotting
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(ggplot2)

# Create data.frame for plotting
df_gpp_plot <- rbind(
  output |>
    filter(sitename == "FR-Pue") |>
    unnest(data) |>
    select(date, gpp) |>
    mutate(type = "P-model output"),
  p_model_validation |>
    filter(sitename == "FR-Pue") |>
    unnest(data) |>
    select(date, gpp) |>
    mutate(type = "Observed")
)
df_gpp_plot$type <- factor(df_gpp_plot$type,
                           levels = c('P-model output',
                                      'Observed'))

# Plot GPP
ggplot(data = df_gpp_plot) +
  geom_line(
    aes(x = date,
        y = gpp,
        color = type),
    alpha = 0.7
  ) +
  scale_color_manual(values = c(
    'P-model output'='grey70',
    'Observed'='black')) +
  theme_classic() +
  theme(panel.grid.major.y = element_line()) +
  labs(
    x = 'Date',
    y = expression(paste("GPP (g C m"^-2, "s"^-1, ")")),
    colour = ""
  )

Calibrating model parameters

To optimize new parameters based upon driver data and a validation dataset we must first specify an optimization strategy and settings, as well as a cost function and parameter ranges.

settings <- list(
  method              = "GenSA",
  metric              = cost_rmse_pmodel,
  control = list(
    maxit = 100),
  par = list(
    kphio = list(lower=0.02, upper=0.2, init = 0.05)
    )
)

rsofun supports both optimization using the GenSA and BayesianTools packages. The above statement provides settings for a GenSA optimization approach. For this example the maximum number of iterations is kept artificially low. In a real scenario you will have to increase this value orders of magnitude. Keep in mind that optimization routines rely on a cost function, which, depending on its structure influences parameter selection. A limited set of cost functions is provided but the model structure is transparent and custom cost functions can be easily written. More details can be found in the “Parameter calibration and cost functions” vignette.

In addition starting values and ranges are provided for the free parameters in the model. Free parameters include: parameters for the quantum yield efficiency kphio, kphio_par_a and kphio_par_b, soil moisture stress parameters soilm_thetastar and soilm_betao, and also beta_unitcostratio, rd_to_vcmax, tau_acclim and kc_jmax (see ?runread_pmodel_f). Be mindful that with newer versions of rsofun additional parameters might be introduced, so re-check vignettes and function documentation when updating existing code.

With all settings defined the optimization function calib_sofun() can be called with driver data and observations specified. Extra arguments for the cost function (like what variable should be used as target to compute the root mean squared error (RMSE) and previous values for the parameters that aren’t calibrated, which are needed to run the P-model).

# calibrate the model and optimize free parameters
pars <- calib_sofun(
    drivers = p_model_drivers,  
    obs = p_model_validation,
    settings = settings,
    # extra arguments passed to the cost function:
    targets = "gpp",             # define target variable GPP
    par_fixed = params_modl[-1]  # fix non-calibrated parameters to previous 
                                 # values, removing kphio
  )

When successful the optimized parameters can be used to run subsequent modelling efforts, in this case slightly improving the model fit over a more global parameter set.

# Update the parameter list with calibrated value
params_modl$kphio <- pars$par["kphio"]

# Run the model for these parameters
output_new <- rsofun::runread_pmodel_f(
  p_model_drivers,
  par = params_modl
  )

# Update data.frame for plotting
df_gpp_plot <- rbind(
  df_gpp_plot,
  output_new |>
    filter(sitename == "FR-Pue") |>
    unnest(data) |>
    select(date, gpp) |>
    mutate(type = "P-model output (calibrated)")
)
df_gpp_plot$type <- factor(df_gpp_plot$type,
                           levels = c('P-model output',
                                      'P-model output (calibrated)',
                                      'Observed'))

# Plot GPP
ggplot(data = df_gpp_plot) +
  geom_line(
    aes(x = date,
        y = gpp,
        color = type),
    alpha = 0.7
  ) +
  scale_color_manual(values = c(
    'P-model output'='grey70',
    'P-model output (calibrated)'='grey40',
    'Observed'='black')) +
  theme_classic() +
  theme(panel.grid.major.y = element_line()) +
  labs(
    x = 'Date',
    y = expression(paste("GPP (g C m"^-2, "s"^-1, ")")),
    colour = ""
  )

For details on the optimization settings we refer to the manuals of GenSA and BayesianTools.