The question of how the distribution of species is influenced by environmental conditions is an important topic of study in ecology. Because of that, we will show in this tutorial how to implement a simple niche suitability model in metaRange. For this, we will create a landscape with two environmental variables (temperature and precipitation) and then add two similar species to it that only differ in their environmental preferences. At the end we can run the simulation and compare how this difference affects the distribution of the species.
First we load the packages and create the example landscape.
Now we can (again) turn the raster into an SDS
with one
layer per time step.
sim <- create_simulation(
source_environment = landscape,
ID = "example_simulation",
seed = 1
)
#> number of time steps: 10
#> time step layer mapping: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
#> added environment
#> class : SpatRasterDataset
#> subdatasets : 2
#> dimensions : 90, 95 (nrow, ncol)
#> nlyr : 10, 10
#> resolution : 0.008333333, 0.008333333 (x, y)
#> extent : 5.741667, 6.533333, 49.44167, 50.19167 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
#> coord. ref. : lon/lat WGS 84 (EPSG:4326)
#> source(s) : memory
#> names : temperature, precipitation
#>
#> created simulation: example_simulation
sim$add_species(name = "species_1")
#> adding species
#> name: species_1
sim$add_species(name = "species_2")
#> adding species
#> name: species_2
To start, we add the same traits as in the previous tutorials and
also add a trait called climate_suitability
, where we will
store the information about how suitable the environment in each cell is
for the population that lives there.
sim$add_traits(
species = c("species_1", "species_2"),
population_level = TRUE,
abundance = 500,
climate_suitability = 1,
reproduction_rate = 0.3,
carrying_capacity = 1000
)
#> adding traits:
#> [1] "abundance" "climate_suitability" "reproduction_rate"
#> [4] "carrying_capacity"
#>
#> to species:
#> [1] "species_1" "species_2"
#>
Contrary to the above, some traits may not require to be stored at
the population level. In this example, this could be the case for the
environmental preferences of a species. If we assume that they are a
property of the species as a whole (i.e. the same for all populations),
we can set the parameter population_level
to
FALSE
and the traits will be added as they are, without
further processing.
As mentioned in the introduction paragraph, we will give both species different environmental preferences for the two environmental variables in the simulation environment (temperature & precipitation).
Note that the names of the traits are arbitrary and can be chosen by the user and that there is no predetermined connection between e.g. “min_temperature” and the temperature variable in the environment. To establish these connections, the user needs to add processes to the species that access the correct traits and use them in a sensible way (This is why meaningful trait names are important).
sim$add_traits(
species = "species_1",
population_level = FALSE,
max_temperature = 300, # Kelvin
optimal_temperature = 288, # Kelvin
min_temperature = 280, # Kelvin
max_precipitation = 1000, # mm
optimal_precipitation = 700, # mm
min_precipitation = 200 # mm
)
#> adding traits:
#> [1] "max_temperature" "optimal_temperature" "min_temperature"
#> [4] "max_precipitation" "optimal_precipitation" "min_precipitation"
#>
#> to species:
#> [1] "species_1"
#>
sim$add_traits(
species = "species_2",
population_level = FALSE,
max_temperature = 290,
optimal_temperature = 285,
min_temperature = 270,
max_precipitation = 1000,
optimal_precipitation = 500,
min_precipitation = 0
)
#> adding traits:
#> [1] "max_temperature" "optimal_temperature" "min_temperature"
#> [4] "max_precipitation" "optimal_precipitation" "min_precipitation"
#> to species:
#> [1] "species_2"
#>
To calculate the suitability, we use the metaRange function
calculate_suitability()
that was adapted from a equation
published by Yin et al. in 1995 (Ref. 1) and simplified by Yan and Hunt
in 1999 (eq:4 in Ref. 2). The equation takes the three cardinal values
of an environmental niche (minimum tolerable value, optimal vale and
maximum tolerable value) and constructs a suitability curve based on a
beta distribution.
In the following code we add a process to both species that calculates the environmental suitability for precipitation and temperature and then multiplies the values to create a joint suitability over the two niches. Note that one could also define a custom function to calculate the suitability, if this built-in function does not adequately describe the ecology of the target species.
sim$add_process(
species = c("species_1", "species_2"),
process_name = "calculate_suitability",
process_fun = function() {
self$traits$climate_suitability <-
calculate_suitability(
self$traits$max_temperature,
self$traits$optimal_temperature,
self$traits$min_temperature,
self$sim$environment$current$temperature
) *
calculate_suitability(
self$traits$max_precipitation,
self$traits$optimal_precipitation,
self$traits$min_precipitation,
self$sim$environment$current$precipitation
)
},
execution_priority = 1
)
#> adding process: calculate_suitability
#> to species:
#> [1] "species_1" "species_2"
#>
As in the previous tutorials, we use a Ricker reproduction model to calculate the new abundance of the species, but this time we let both the carrying capacity and the reproduction rate depend on the niche suitability of the environment.
sim$add_process(
species = c("species_1", "species_2"),
process_name = "reproduction",
process_fun = function() {
self$traits$abundance <-
ricker_reproduction_model(
self$traits$abundance,
self$traits$reproduction_rate * self$traits$climate_suitability,
self$traits$carrying_capacity * self$traits$climate_suitability
)
},
execution_priority = 2
)
#> adding process: reproduction
#> to species:
#> [1] "species_1" "species_2"
#>
Now, we can execute the simulation and compare the results.
set_verbosity(1)
sim$begin()
#> Starting simualtion.
#> start of time step: 1
#> 10 % done | 0.017 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 2
#> 20 % done | 0.13 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 3
#> 30 % done | 0.079 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 4
#> 40 % done | 0.069 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 5
#> 50 % done | 0.058 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 6
#> 60 % done | 0.045 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 7
#> 70 % done | 0.033 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 8
#> 80 % done | 0.024 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 9
#> 90 % done | 0.017 secs remaining (estimate)
#> start of time step: 10
#> 100 % done | 0 secs remaining (estimate)
#>
#> Simulation: 'example_simulation' finished
#> Exiting the Simulation
#> Runtime: 0.12 secs
Yin, X., Kropff, M.J., McLaren, G., Visperas, R.M., (1995) A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Volume 77, Issues 1-2, Pages 1–16, doi:10.1016/0168-1923(95)02236-Q
Yan, W., Hunt, L.A. (1999) An Equation for Modelling the Temperature Response of Plants using only the Cardinal Temperatures, Annals of Botany, Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 607–614, ISSN 0305-7364, doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.0955