Unobservable group structures are a common challenge in panel data analysis. Disregarding group-level heterogeneity can introduce bias. Conversely, estimating individual coefficients for each cross-sectional unit is inefficient and may lead to high uncertainty.
This package efficiently addresses the issue of unobservable group structures by implementing the pairwise adaptive group fused Lasso (PAGFL) by Mehrabani (2023). PAGFL is a regularizer that identifies latent group structures and estimates group-specific coefficients in a single step. On top of that, we extend the PAGFL to time-varying functional coefficients.
The PAGFL
package makes this powerful procedure easy to
use. On top of that, we extend the PAGFL
to time-varying
functional coefficients.
Always stay up-to-date with the development version of
PAGFL
(1.1.2) from GitHub:
# install.packages("devtools")
::install_github("Paul-Haimerl/PAGFL")
devtoolslibrary(PAGFL)
The stable version (1.1.1) is available on CRAN:
install.packages("PAGFL")
The PAGFL
package includes a function that automatically
simulates a panel data set with a group structure in the slope
coefficients:
# Simulate a simple panel with three distinct groups and two exogenous explanatory variables
set.seed(1)
<- sim_DGP(N = 20, n_periods = 150, p = 2, n_groups = 3)
sim <- sim$data data
\[y_{it} = \beta_i^\prime x_{it} + \eta_i + u_{it}, \quad i = 1, \dots, N, \quad t = 1, \dots, T,\] where \(y_{it}\) is a scalar dependent variable, \(x_{it}\) a \(p \times 1\) vector of explanatory variables, and \(\eta_i\) reflects a fixed effect. The slope coefficients are subject to the group structure
\[\beta_{i} = \sum_{k = 1}^K \alpha_k \boldsymbol{1} \{i \in G_k \},\] with \(\cup_{k = 1}^K G_k = \{1, \dots, N \}\), and \(G_k \cap G_j = \emptyset\) as well as \(|| \alpha_k \neq \alpha_j ||\) for any \(k \neq j\), \(k,j = 1, \dots, K\) (see Mehrabani 2023, sec. 2).
sim_DGP
also nests, among other, all DGPs employed in
the simulation study of Mehrabani (2023, sec. 6).
I refer to the documentation of sim_DGP
or Mehrabani (2023, sec. 6)
for more details.
To execute the PAGFL procedure, pass the dependent and independent variables, the number of time periods, and a penalization parameter \(\lambda\).
<- pagfl(y ~ X1 + X2, data = data, n_periods = 150, lambda = 20, verbose = F)
estim summary(estim)
#> Call:
#> pagfl(formula = y ~ X1 + X2, data = data, n_periods = 150, lambda = 20,
#> verbose = F)
#>
#> Balanced panel: N = 20, T = 150, obs = 3000
#>
#> Convergence reached:
#> TRUE (49 iterations)
#>
#> Information criterion:
#> IC lambda
#> 1.354 20.000
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -4.47230 -0.72086 -0.00120 0.76214 4.31838
#>
#> 2 groups:
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> X1 X2
#> Group 1 -0.36838 1.61275
#> Group 2 -0.49489 -1.23534
#>
#> Residual standard error: 1.15012 on 2978 degrees of freedom
#> Mean squared error 1.31307
#> Multiple R-squared: 0.65845, Adjusted R-squared: 0.65605
pagfl()
returns an object of type pagfl
,
which holds
model
: A data.frame
containing the
dependent and explanatory variables as well as individual and time
indices (if provided).coefficients
: A \(K \times
p\) matrix of the post-Lasso group-specific parameter
estimates.groups
: A list
containing (i) the total
number of groups \(\hat{K}\) and (ii) a
vector of estimated group memberships \((\hat{g}_1, \dots, \hat{g}_N)\), where
\(\hat{g}_i = k\) if \(i\) is assigned to group \(k\).residuals
: A vector of residuals of the demeaned
model.fitted
: A vector of fitted values of the demeaned
model.args
: A list of additional arguments.IC
: A list
containing (i) the value of the
IC, (ii) the employed tuning parameter \(\lambda\), and (iii) the mean squared
error.convergence
: A list
containing (i) a
logical variable if convergence was achieved and (ii) the number of
executed ADMM algorithm iterations.call
: The function call.Furthermore, pagfl
objects can be used in a variety of
useful generic methods like summary()
,
fitted()
, resid()
, df.residual
,
formula
, and coef()
.
<- fitted(estim) estim_fit
Selecting a \(\lambda\) value a
priori can be tricky. For instance, it seems like
lambda = 20
is too high since the number of groups \(K\) is underestimated. We suggest iterating
over a comprehensive range of candidate values to trace out the correct
model. To specify a suitable grid, create a logarithmic sequence ranging
from 0 to a penalty parameter that induces an entirely homogeneous model
(i.e., \(\widehat{K} = 1\)). The
resulting \(\lambda\) grid vector can
be passed in place of any specific value, and a BIC IC selects the
best-fitting parameter.
Furthermore, it is also possible to supply a data.frame
with named variables and choose a specific formula that selects the
variables in that data.frame
. If the explanatory variables
in X
are named, these names also appear in the output.
colnames(data)[-1] <- c("a", "b")
<- exp(log(10) * seq(log10(1e-4), log10(10), length.out = 10))
lambda_set <- pagfl(y ~ a + b, data = data, n_periods = 150, lambda = lambda_set, verbose = F)
estim_set summary(estim_set)
#> Call:
#> pagfl(formula = y ~ a + b, data = data, n_periods = 150, lambda = lambda_set,
#> verbose = F)
#>
#> Balanced panel: N = 20, T = 150, obs = 3000
#>
#> Convergence reached:
#> TRUE (51 iterations)
#>
#> Information criterion:
#> IC lambda
#> 1.12877 0.21544
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -3.47858 -0.66283 -0.02688 0.72880 3.77812
#>
#> 3 groups:
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 3
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> a b
#> Group 1 -0.95114 1.61719
#> Group 2 -0.49489 -1.23534
#> Group 3 0.24172 1.61613
#>
#> Residual standard error: 1.03695 on 2978 degrees of freedom
#> Mean squared error 1.06738
#> Multiple R-squared: 0.72236, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7204
When, as above, the specific estimation method is left unspecified,
pagfl
defaults to penalized Least Squares (PLS)
method = 'PLS'
(Mehrabani, 2023,
sec. 2.2). PLS is very efficient but requires weakly exogenous
regressors. However, even endogenous predictors can be accounted for by
employing a penalized Generalized Method of Moments (PGMM)
routine in combination with exogenous instruments \(\boldsymbol{Z}\).
Specify a slightly more elaborate endogenous and dynamic panel data set and apply PGMM. When encountering a dynamic panel data set, we recommend using a Jackknife bias correction, as proposed by Dhaene and Jochmans (2015).
# Generate a panel where the predictors X correlate with the cross-sectional innovation,
# but can be instrumented with q = 3 variables in Z. Furthermore, include GARCH(1,1)
# innovations, an AR lag of the dependent variable, and specific group sizes
<- sim_DGP(
sim_endo N = 20, n_periods = 200, p = 2, n_groups = 3, group_proportions = c(0.3, 0.3, 0.4),
error_spec = "GARCH", q = 2, dynamic = FALSE
)<- sim_endo$data
data_endo <- sim_endo$Z
Z
# Note that the method PGMM and the instrument matrix Z need to be passed
<- pagfl(y ~ ., data = data_endo, n_periods = 200, lambda = 2, method = "PGMM", Z = Z, bias_correc = TRUE, max_iter = 50e3, verbose = F)
estim_endo summary(estim_endo)
#> Call:
#> pagfl(formula = y ~ ., data = data_endo, n_periods = 200, lambda = 2,
#> method = "PGMM", Z = Z, bias_correc = TRUE, max_iter = 50000,
#> verbose = F)
#>
#> Balanced panel: N = 20, T = 200, obs = 3980
#>
#> Convergence reached:
#> TRUE (14632 iterations)
#>
#> Information criterion:
#> IC lambda
#> 1.97129 2.00000
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -4.87011 -0.90055 0.01193 0.90767 5.54203
#>
#> 3 groups:
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 3
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> X1 X2
#> Group 1 0.55337 -1.22836
#> Group 2 -0.88484 -0.89231
#> Group 3 1.60547 -1.43718
#>
#> Residual standard error: 1.38812 on 3958 degrees of freedom
#> Mean squared error 1.91621
#> Multiple R-squared: 0.87079, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8701
Furthermore, pagfl
lets you select a minimum group size,
adjust the efficiency vs. accuracy trade-off of the iterative estimation
algorithm, and modify a list of further settings. Visit the
documentation ?pagfl()
for more information.
The package also includes the functions sim_tv_DGP()
and
tv_pagfl()
, which generate and estimate grouped panel data
models with the time-varying coefficients \(\beta_i (t/T)\). Just like in the static
case, the functional coefficients admit to a group structure \(\beta_{i} (t/T) = \sum_{k = 1}^K \alpha_k (t/T)
\boldsymbol{1} \{i \in G_k \}\). Following Su et al. (2019), the
time-varying coefficients are estimated using polynomial B-spline
functions employing a penalized sieve estimation (PSE).
# Simulate a time-varying panel with a trend and a group pattern
<- 20
N <- 100
n_periods <- sim_tv_DGP(N = N, n_periods = n_periods, sd_error = 1, intercept = TRUE, p = 1)
tv_sim <- tv_sim$data
tv_data
<- tv_pagfl(y ~ 1, data = tv_data, n_periods = n_periods, lambda = 5, verbose = F)
tv_estim summary(tv_estim)
#> Call:
#> tv_pagfl(formula = y ~ 1, data = tv_data, n_periods = n_periods,
#> lambda = 5, verbose = F)
#>
#> Balanced panel: N = 20, T = 100, obs = 2000
#>
#> Convergence reached:
#> TRUE (212 iterations)
#>
#> Information criterion:
#> IC lambda
#> 1.16747 5.00000
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -3.57761 -0.68826 0.00820 0.70118 3.40708
#>
#> 3 groups:
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 3
#>
#> Residual standard error: 1.02901 on 1974 degrees of freedom
#> Mean squared error 1.04509
#> Multiple R-squared: 0.74213, Adjusted R-squared: 0.73886
tv_pagfl()
returns an object of class
tvpagfl
, which contains
model
: A data.frame
containing the
dependent and explanatory variables as well as individual and time
indices (if provided).coefficients
: A list holding (i) a \(T \times p^{(1)} \times \hat{K}\) array of
the post-Lasso group-specific functional coefficients and (ii) a \(K \times p^{(2)}\) matrix of time-constant
parameter estimates (when running a mixed time-varying panel data
model).groups
: A list
containing (i) the total
number of groups \(\hat{K}\) and (ii) a
vector of estimated group memberships \((\hat{g}_1, \dots, \hat{g}_N)\), where
\(\hat{g}_i = k\) if \(i\) is assigned to group \(k\).residuals
: A vector of residuals of the demeaned
model.fitted
: A vector of fitted values of the demeaned
model.args
: A list of additional arguments.IC
: A list
containing (i) the value of the
IC, (ii) the employed tuning parameter \(\lambda\), and (iii) the mean squared
error.convergence
: A list
containing (i) a
logical variable if convergence was achieved and (ii) the number of
executed ADMM algorithm iterations.call
: The function call.Again, tvpagfl
objects have generic
summary()
, fitted()
, resid()
,
df.residual
, formula
, and coef()
methods.
In empirical applications, it is commonplace to encounter unbalanced panel data sets. In such instances, time-varying coefficient functions can be estimated nonetheless. The nonparametric spline functions simply interpolate missing periods. However, when using unbalanced datasets it is required to provide explicit indicator variables that declare the cross-sectional individual and time period each observation belongs to.
Lets delete 30% of observations, add indicator variables, and run
tv_pagfl()
again.
# Draw some observations to be omitted
<- as.logical(rbinom(n = N * n_periods, prob = 0.7, size = 1))
delete_index # Construct cross-sectional and time indicator variables
$i_index <- rep(1:N, each = n_periods)
tv_data$t_index <- rep(1:n_periods, N)
tv_data# Delete some observations
<- tv_data[delete_index, ]
tv_data # Apply the time-varying PAGFL to an unbalanced panel
<- tv_pagfl(y ~ 1, data = tv_data, index = c("i_index", "t_index"), lambda = 5, verbose = F)
tv_estim_unbalanced summary(tv_estim_unbalanced)
#> Call:
#> tv_pagfl(formula = y ~ 1, data = tv_data, index = c("i_index",
#> "t_index"), lambda = 5, verbose = F)
#>
#> Unbalanced panel: N = 20, T = 64-75, obs = 1379
#>
#> Convergence reached:
#> TRUE (950 iterations)
#>
#> Information criterion:
#> IC lambda
#> 1.1915 5.0000
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -3.43491 -0.69055 -0.00812 0.68488 3.63894
#>
#> 3 groups:
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 2
#>
#> Residual standard error: 1.04387 on 1353 degrees of freedom
#> Mean squared error 1.06912
#> Multiple R-squared: 0.73683, Adjusted R-squared: 0.73197
Furthermore, tv_pagfl
lets you specify a lot more
optionalities than shown here. For example, it is possible to adjust the
polyomial degree and the number of interior knots in the spline basis
system, or estimate a panel data model with a mix of time-varying and
time-constant coefficients. See ?tv_pagfl()
for
details.
The package is still under active development. Future versions are planned to include
You are not a R-user? Worry not - An equivalent Python library is in the works.
Please feel free to reach out if you have any further suggestions.
Dhaene, G., & Jochmans, K. (2015). Split-panel jackknife estimation of fixed-effect models. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(3), 991-1030. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdv007
Mehrabani, A. (2023). Estimation and identification of latent group structures in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1464-1482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.12.002
Schumaker, L. (2007). Spline functions: basic theory. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618994
Su, L., Wang, X., & Jin, S. (2019). Sieve estimation of time-varying panel data models with latent structures. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 334-349. DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2017.1340299